Can't read it? Listen now!
China has stepped forward to back the World Health Organization (WHO) following the recent decision by the United States to exit the health body. The move came after former U.S. President Donald Trump signed an executive order citing dissatisfaction with the WHO’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Speaking on Tuesday, Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun underlined the importance of strengthening, not weakening, the organization, reiterating China’s ongoing commitment to supporting the organization in its global mission. He further emphasized the shared responsibility of nations in ensuring global health, stating China’s intent to contribute to a “shared community of health for humanity.”
The U.S. withdrawal followed Trump’s repeated criticism of the WHO, accusing it of mismanaging the COVID-19 crisis and alleging bias toward China. While the decision was initially announced during the Trump administration, it continues to generate global debate on the role of international organizations in handling public health emergencies.
Critics of the U.S. decision warn that the withdrawal could weaken global health efforts, particularly during an era of frequent health crises. Advocates for reform argue that the WHO’s challenges should be addressed through collective improvement rather than withdrawal.
China’s vocal support for the WHO demonstrates its intention to position itself as a global leader in multilateral cooperation, particularly in health governance. Observers note that this move could also enhance China’s influence in shaping global health policies at a time when the U.S. role appears diminished.
Despite China’s assurance of support, the WHO faces mounting challenges. Funding, political pressures, and reform demands have raised concerns about its capacity to navigate the complexities of global health. The departure of the U.S., historically one of the largest financial contributors, adds further uncertainty.
Global reactions to the U.S. decision remain mixed. While some nations have echoed concerns about the WHO’s shortcomings, many believe that engagement and reform within the organization are preferable to withdrawal.
The ongoing dialogue surrounding the WHO’s future reflects broader questions about the role of international institutions in addressing shared challenges. Whether this moment strengthens or divides global health efforts remains to be seen.
